7nm AMD cpus geforce gpus nvidia Radeon Vega 64 ray tracing RTX RTX 2060 RTX 2070 RTX 2080 RX 5700 RX 5700 XT Vega 64

AMD’s RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT Reviewed: RDNA Puts Radeon Back in the Game

The AMD RX 5700 and AMD RX 5700 XT are Staff Pink’s newest salvos in the GPU market, and a serious try to improve its competitive standing relative to Nvidia. Whereas these new GPUs lack the ray tracing help Nvidia has been pushing as a serious RTX function, AMD is hoping that its personal performance enhancements, further capabilities, and new card designs will appeal to recent consumers.

Before diving into the knowledge, we have to replace you on pricing. When AMD announced the 5700 and 5700 XT, it set retail pricing for the two playing cards at $379 and $450. On Friday, AMD announced adjusted pricing — $350 for the 5700, and simply $400 for the RX 5700 XT.

AMD’s worth cuts have been pushed by necessity. Nvidia lately refreshed its own RTX GPU family with the 2060 Super, 2070 Super, and 2080 Super. The 2 GPUsSEEAMAZON_ET_135 See Amazon ET commerce which have launched so far have both introduced vital efficiency improvements into the stack, though not higher prices. The RTX 2060S performs nearly identically to the previous RTX 2070 (but prices $400 as an alternative of $500) while the RTX 2070S is ~96 % as quick as the RTX 2080. The SKUs we’re most interested in comparing in this evaluate are charted under:


The Radeon RX 5700 and 5700 XT will square off with the RTX 2060 and RTX 2060S / RTX 2070. Take note of the Radeon RX 5700 versus Vega 64 match-up. On paper, Vega 64 has an enormous texture price advantage, virtually as a lot pixel fillrate, and even more reminiscence bandwidth. You’d anticipate it to win any tussle.

You’d be improper.

The 5700 and 5700 XT proceed the understated, virtually industrial design that the Radeon VII debuted earlier this yr. The reference RX 5700 is a squared-off, rectangular design, while the 5700 XT provides a bit of variation with an irregular melancholy in the GPU shroud.

The Match-Up: What We’re Wanting For

Even before Navi launched, it had already had an impression on the graphics market; Nvidia didn’t reduce Turing prices out of the goodness of its coronary heart.

The large question for AMD, right here, is whether it may possibly set up some momentum around its GPUs. It’s been six years since AMD decisively seized the efficiency crown from Nvidia with Hawaii. The GPU families that have adopted — Fury, Polaris, Vega — have struggled, to at least one degree or one other. AMD has typically needed to push its architectures as far as it probably might in order to match or almost match Nvidia’s performance. Operating a chip at the far finish of its clock curve tends to hit power efficiency quite onerous, and AMD’s GPUs haven’t been notably aggressive with Nvidia in general power consumption since Pascal debuted.

When it unveiled its RDNA structure at E3, AMD talked up the 5700 and 5700 XT’s improved efficiency, larger instruction execution price, and better energy consumption. Now that it has made the leap to 7nm, clients are going to anticipate considerably higher efficiency and effectivity than what it shipped on 14nm three years ago.

AMD has also made the choice not to integrate ray tracing help into its present lineup of PC products, regardless of Nvidia heavily pushing the function for the past yr. This introduces another wrinkle into the value comparison between the two corporations. GPU manufacturers aren’t required to match each other on each function, however clients sometimes need to see equal worth. We’ll should see if the RX 5700 and 5700 XT can measure up.

We’ll be comparing the 5700 XT’s general efficiency and efficiency to both the Radeon Vega 64 and the Radeon VII. The Vega 64 is the closest 14nm AMD GPU to the 5700 XT so far as expected efficiency, while the Radeon VII is AMD’s first 7nm GPU design, however constructed on the older GCN architecture. We don’t anticipate the 5700 XT to beat the Radeon VII, however how close they are in terms of general efficiency will inform us some fascinating things about RDNA versus GCN.

Check Setup

All of our check outcomes have been generated using a Core i7-8086Okay CPU and an Asus Prime Z370-A motherboard with 32GB of DDR4-3200 and the version 2201 UEFI. Nvidia’s 430.86 WHQL driver was used for testing all NV playing cards. AMD GPUs have been tested utilizing the launch driver offered by AMD, apart from the Radeon VII, which was tested using the Adrenaline 19.5.2 driver (6/3/2019). A 1TB Samsung 970 EVO handled storage necessities.

Our Windows 10 testbed used the Might 2019 Windows Replace and had all further security patches put in. Spectre, Meltdown, and comparable safety patches have been all left in their default states.

All energy consumption measurements have been made using a Kill-A-Watt meter installed at the wall and a Thermaltake RGB 1250 80 Plus Titanium energy provide. Energy measured in Metro Final Mild Redux at 1080p Very High detail with SSAA enabled. Power measurements have been taken on the third benchmark run to permit for system warm-up.

All of the check results in this evaluate, including energy consumption measurements, have been run recent for this collection of evaluations. We’ve stored the older GTX 1080 and 1080 Ti in this suite of evaluations as properly, to measure how nicely Pascal is preserving tempo with this new era of cards.

The RTX 2060 is the direct comparison for the Radeon RX 5700, but the RTX 2070 must be thought-about as a stand-in for the RTX 2060S, as that’s the GPU the RX 5700 XT will compete towards. The Gigabyte Aorus RTX 2080 is a stand-in for the RTX 2070S,SEEAMAZON_ET_135 See Amazon ET commerce however maintain in mind, that GPU continues to be $100 costlier than the RX 5700 XT. The 1080 Ti and RTX 2080 / 2070S near-equivalent are included right here for reference, not because they symbolize the direct rivals for these two GPUs.

  • We aren’t displaying minimums for Hitman as a result of Excel couldn’t show them properly when utilizing this modified template. These values are sometimes fairly low (5-10fps).
  • Warhammer II’s DX11 implementation is vastly better for Nvidia cards than its DX12 path, whereas the reverse is true for AMD. In this benchmark, we use the greatest path for every GPU.
  • The Core i7-8086Okay is functionally similar to the Core i7-8700Okay and may be seen as a stand-in for that CPU.
  • Metro Exodus is examined in Excessive detail, but with Superior PhysX and Hairworks disabled. As with Last Mild, we benchmark with SSAA enabled.

Our results are embedded in the slideshow under. Every slide could be clicked to open it in a separate window.

Power Consumption, Noise

While I don’t have a dB meter sensitive sufficient to measure GPU followers in a reliable means, I don’t need one to tell the difference between the RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT and just about each other AMD reference card manufactured since 2013.

The 5700 and 5700 XT are quiet. No, they aren’t inaudible — but they’re head and shoulders higher than any high-end reference card AMD has launched in this approximate worth bracket for a very long time. Once we met with AMD at E3, we have been advised that the blowers have been locked to a maximum sound degree of 42 dBa. That sounds (no pun meant) about proper to us.

So. The RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT supply reasonably better performance than the RTX 2060 and RTX 2070, respectively. They’re much quieter than the Vega 64 or Radeon VII. How do they examine on energy consumption?


There are a number of alternative ways to take a look at this knowledge. First, let’s take the RX 5700 versus Vega 64. The RX 5700 matches Vega 64’s efficiency in nearly every case, but draws virtually a 3rd less power. The Radeon RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT each draw more energy than the RTX 2060 and RTX 2070, but they’re additionally quicker cards. Regulate for that difference, and the barely larger power draw of both AMD playing cards is definitely in-line with their efficiency advantage.

In fact, the trumpeting elephant in the room, in this case, is the undeniable fact that AMD’s GPUs are built on a brand-new 7nm process node, while Nvidia’s are nonetheless caught back on 12nm. This can be a very reasonable level, and it implies that AMD continues to be enjoying catch-up on general power efficiency compared with Nvidia.

This isn’t shocking. More than five years handed from when AMD hired Jim Keller to when Ryzen launched. When Vega debuted to disappointing critiques in August 2017, scuttlebutt prompt the GPU’s improvement cycle had been hampered by the all-hands-on-deck scramble to complete Ryzen and get it out the door. Whereas AMD has since devoted further engineering assets to enhancing the GPU aspect of its enterprise, these modifications haven’t had almost as long to bake. The time scales are totally different and so is the affordable degree of expected relative enchancment.

Navi doesn’t close the power efficiency gap in one fell swoop, nevertheless it’s much more environment friendly than something AMD has shipped in current reminiscence and its competitively environment friendly with what Nvidia has to supply, even if AMD is leaning exhausting on a node advance to do it. Your utility firm doesn’t care what course of node your appliances are built on, just how much energy they use.

Conclusion: Greater Performance, Fewer Options

I’ve received extra to say about Navi, the present state of the graphics market, and the wisdom of investing in ray tracing now that Nvidia has minimize GPU prices. With two CPUs and two GPUs launching on the similar day, I’m going to should ask for a bit of time to tug my thoughts collectively.

General, although, I’d say Navi is definitely the most impressive AMD GPU since at the very least the HD 7970. Which may seem shocking, provided that it isn’t in an general leadership position and it doesn’t ship a killer knockout blow to Nvidia’s product stack — though we’d be writing a very totally different conclusion to that point if Nvidia hadn’t simply minimize its own costs.

AMD has been enjoying second-fiddle to Nvidia in the GPU marketplace for years, now. It wanted a GPU that would compete on power and efficiency. It needed an architecture that would hit its goal clock charges. Ever since Fury, it has felt as if AMD and GCN have been exhausting up towards an efficiency and scaling wall, clawing for each scrap of efficiency they might find. With Navi, it looks like the firm can breathe once more.

I’m going to have extra to say about features, positioning, ray tracing, and the like. But what I’ll depart you with is this: More than it needed any specific function, AMD wanted to exhibit that it might still construct aggressive, well-positioned playing cards. The RX 5700 and 5700 XT ship on this promise. They’re quicker than the RTX 2060 and RTX 2070 and the worth cuts AMD introduced will hold them quite efficient towards the RTX 2060 / RTX 2060S. If the company can continue to enhance its designs and increase general effectivity, the rumored “big Navi” (anticipated in 2020) must be one thing to see.

Now Learn: